From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 18 03:07:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 4A4451065674; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 03:07:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 03:07:04 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh Message-ID: <20111118030704.GB37436@FreeBSD.org> References: <201111180109.pAI19SLC058442@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201111180109.pAI19SLC058442@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/libunwind Makefile distinfo pkg-plist X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 03:07:04 -0000 On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 01:09:28AM +0000, Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh wrote: > sunpoet 2011-11-18 01:09:28 UTC > > Modified files: > devel/libunwind Makefile distinfo pkg-plist > Log: > - Update to 20110911 which is actually official 1.0.1 to avoid > PORTEPOCH bump One of the reasons YYYYMMDD versions without leading protective 0.0. prefix should be used with extra care (that is, when YYYYMMDD is official version number and upstream maintainer do not plan to switch once they're out of beta or something). But kudos for caring for PORTEPOCH, appreciated. ./danfe