Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 13:57:04 -0700 From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <chad@shire.net> To: danial_thom@yahoo.com Cc: Mike Hernandez <sequethin@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs Linux Message-ID: <BE2E29A0-7D59-424A-AA34-109BB09FE70E@shire.net> In-Reply-To: <20060117183824.45395.qmail@web33312.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20060117183824.45395.qmail@web33312.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jan 17, 2006, at 11:38 AM, Danial Thom wrote: > No, thats ridiculous. Linux has multiple > distributions that use the same kernel. The fact > that freebsd only has one distribution doesn't > make it any more complete. Actually it is spot on. Linux is a kernel. The various distributions add a ueserland and tools to it but if you go look at the actual definition of Linux you will find it is just a kernel. Chad --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad at shire.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BE2E29A0-7D59-424A-AA34-109BB09FE70E>