From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Jul 15  3:22: 7 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from zabagek.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (zabagek.ihf.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.90.60])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E1EAB14ED9; Thu, 15 Jul 1999 03:21:53 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from tg@zabagek.ihf.rwth-aachen.de)
Received: (from tg@localhost)
	by zabagek.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA88785;
	Thu, 15 Jul 1999 12:22:12 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from tg)
To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, kip@lyris.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: seg fault in mutex_queue_enq
References: <199907151003.GAA09860@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Thomas Gellekum <tg@ihf.rwth-aachen.de>
Date: 15 Jul 1999 12:22:12 +0200
In-Reply-To: Daniel Eischen's message of "Thu, 15 Jul 1999 06:03:12 -0400 (EDT)"
Message-ID: <kq3dyqfc17.fsf@zabagek.ihf.rwth-aachen.de>
Lines: 12
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.34/XEmacs 20.4 - "Emerald"
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> writes:

> The libc_r version number was bumped in -current because of the
> addition of poll().  Is this allowed in -stable, or something
> that waits for a -RELEASE?

Jordan should have to say something about this. AFAIR, bumps are
allowed but only by one between releases. We will have to provide
libc_r.so.3 in /usr/lib/compat/compat3x, though (we'll have to do this 
anyway by the time 4.x is released).

tg


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message