Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 09:31:09 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, Vulpes Velox <v.velox@vvelox.net> Subject: Re: LDAP integration Message-ID: <20070108093109.6xq4kzr7k040sg00@webmail.leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <45A1DE76.7000201@FreeBSD.org> References: <20070107190616.73dee7b0@vixen42> <45A1DE76.7000201@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> (from Sun, 07 Jan 2007 =20 22:02:30 -0800): > Vulpes Velox wrote: >> I was just wondering. How many people here have given lots of though >> about integrating FreeBSD configuration with LDAP. I've just begun >> looking at it a lot more and was curious as to what other people >> think in this area. > > It would be more useful to have this discussion if you defined what > you meant by "FreeBSD configuration" in more detail. You might also > want to search the archives first, there is a lot of discussion about > various proposals in this area, all of which end up getting shot down > because they don't offer sufficient added value to justify the pain of > the change. I had the impression that in general the opinion is that it would be =20 nice to have it in the tree, but that the generic infrastructure =20 should be committed first (the GSoC 2006 nss work without the LDAP =20 part) and then a patch should be presented to let the people have a =20 look at the complete picture. Bye, Alexander. --=20 It's a poor workman who blames his tools. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID =3D 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070108093109.6xq4kzr7k040sg00>