From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Dec 7 5:53:53 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 499F437B42C for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 05:53:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fB7DqEj20456; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 14:52:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Dave Rufino Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: statefulness in character device drivers In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 07 Dec 2001 13:51:51 GMT." Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 14:52:14 +0100 Message-ID: <20454.1007733134@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message , Dave R ufino writes: >Hi, > >I remember some discussions a while ago about adding statefulness to >the character device driver layer. What's the consensus now ? Is it going >to be added, and if so, when ? Uhm, I don't hink I understand your question here... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message