From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 27 15:04:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45DB916A401 for ; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 15:04:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from msrv.matik.com.br (msrv.matik.com.br [200.152.83.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB8813C48C for ; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 15:04:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from anc ([200.152.88.34]) by msrv.matik.com.br (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l0RF4fDw065055; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:04:41 -0200 (BRST) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) From: JoaoBR Organization: Infomatik To: Jim Pingle Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:04:28 -0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <8a20e5000701240903q35b89e14k1ab977df62411784@mail.gmail.com> <20070127141052.GA96039@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <45BB6296.1080106@pingle.org> In-Reply-To: <45BB6296.1080106@pingle.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701271304.29216.joao@matik.com.br> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on msrv.matik.com.br X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: rsmith@xs4all.nl, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Loosing spam fight X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 15:04:43 -0000 On Saturday 27 January 2007 12:32, Jim Pingle wrote: > Roland Smith wrote: > > Most spammers do not bother to return if they get a resend request. > > That's the whole point of doing this. So practically it doesn't increase > > bandwidth consumption. > =2E.. > Greylisting is a decent idea, but it seems to me that it's just another > tool in the ongoing arms race against spammers. It may work for a while, > but eventually they'll catch on and it will only cause unnecessary delays > for legitimate mail. > finally some cares about the users here, that is a really important point, = how=20 do you justify that your client get the email he is waiting for an hour=20 later? Probably he looks then for a better service provider ... =2D-=20 Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br