From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 14 01:36:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DAF116A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 01:36:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chuggalug.clues.com (chuggalug.demon.co.uk [62.49.17.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D511B43D48 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 01:36:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from geoffb@chuggalug.clues.com) Received: from chuggalug.clues.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chuggalug.clues.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3E8Uh3N057566; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 08:30:43 GMT (envelope-from geoffb@chuggalug.clues.com) Received: (from geoffb@localhost) by chuggalug.clues.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i3E8UgaE057565; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 08:30:42 GMT (envelope-from geoffb) Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 08:30:42 +0000 From: Geoff Buckingham To: Michal Pasternak Message-ID: <20040414083042.GA57420@chuggalug.clues.com> References: <20040413142348.GB31567@chuggalug.clues.com> <20040413145658.GB96467@pasternak.w.lub.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040413145658.GB96467@pasternak.w.lub.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LSB runtime compliance? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 08:36:13 -0000 On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 04:56:58PM +0200, Michal Pasternak wrote: > Geoff Buckingham [Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 02:23:48PM +0000]: > > After that problems were mainley around paths. Is it possible to force linux > > binaries to only look for files under /compat/linux ? > > chroot / jail ? possibley but having looked through the lsb runtime requirements, I thought it desirable to use native FreeBSD e2fsprogs binaries, maybe linux binaries could be used. Does /compat/linux/dev self populate under current and devfs? Not sure if their would be other cases where native binaries would be prefered?