From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan 24 22:17:50 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23273106566C;
	Mon, 24 Jan 2011 22:17:50 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from olivier.freebsd@free.fr)
Received: from smtpfb1-g21.free.fr (smtpfb1-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.9])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 223AC8FC19;
	Mon, 24 Jan 2011 22:17:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp2-g21.free.fr (smtp2-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.2])
	by smtpfb1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1858D77C7D4;
	Mon, 24 Jan 2011 23:02:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from lon92-4-82-226-188-149.fbx.proxad.net (unknown [82.226.188.149])
	by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC9A54B0105;
	Mon, 24 Jan 2011 23:01:51 +0100 (CET)
From: Olivier Certner <olivier.freebsd@free.fr>
To: brucec@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 23:01:06 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10
References: <201101242116.p0OLGc40036902@freefall.freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <201101242116.p0OLGc40036902@freefall.freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <201101242301.06377.olivier.freebsd@free.fr>
Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, bug-followup@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/154266: LOR between (ufs) vfs_mount.c and (devfs)
	ffs_vfsops.c
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 22:17:50 -0000

	Didn't know this site. Yes, the LOR seems very similar to LOR #276 (except 
that there is no call to 'softdep_flushfiles' in my backtrace). One of the 
LORs tagged #254 is also pretty close.

	Still, I'm surprised that you closed this PR, since the abovementioned LORs 
are all in the 'unknown' state, meaning (at least to me) they have not being 
investigated and are potentially harmful. If this is the current policy for 
those, I'll live with that, although I find it rather strange.

	Thanks for your time,

		Olivier Certner