From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 27 02:18:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5CB5106566C for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:18:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from lariat.net (lariat.net [66.119.58.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 349FF8FC08 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:18:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from anne-o1dpaayth1.lariat.net (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@lariat.net [66.119.58.2]) by lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA17345; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:18:44 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200911270218.TAA17345@lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:18:41 -0700 To: Manolis Kiagias From: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: <4B0F103D.2070607@otenet.gr> References: <200911260629.XAA08100@lariat.net> <200911262320.QAA16364@lariat.net> <4B0F103D.2070607@otenet.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: HTT on Atom (Was: FreeBSD 8.0 and Atheros AzureWave wireless chipset) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:18:56 -0000 At 04:33 PM 11/26/2009, Manolis Kiagias wrote: >Though it seems hyperthreading is improved on the Atom and there is no >penalty for leaving it on. Is there really no penalty? With HZ=1000 there are double the clock interrupts to be serviced at least. And as I understand it the Atom has less redundant hardware, so there are less likely to be unused resources available to the second thread. I am seeing substantially faster compiles with the SMP option commented out of the kernel. --Brett