Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 03:32:46 -0400 From: "David S. Miller" <davem@jenolan.rutgers.edu> To: kuku@gilberto.physik.RWTH-Aachen.DE Cc: hutton@isi.edu, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: throughtput measurements for fast ethernet Message-ID: <199705160732.DAA00547@jenolan.caipgeneral> In-Reply-To: <199705160648.IAA04428@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de> (message from Christoph Kukulies on Fri, 16 May 1997 08:48:13 %2B0200 (MEST))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Christoph Kukulies <kuku@gilberto.physik.RWTH-Aachen.DE> Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 08:48:13 +0200 (MEST) Someone told me some time ago when I was seeking for similar figures (Garret ?) that FreeBSD can saturate 10/100 Mbit with appropriate CPU power. The only interesting question would be CPU utilization during transfer compared to other L-word OSs. I'd be more interested in seeing FreeBSD get low latencies, but as long as you guys are bzero()'ing a structure on the stack of tcp_input() for every packet that arrives just for T/TCP's sake, it isn't going to happen. ---------------------------------------------//// Yow! 11.26 MB/s remote host TCP bandwidth & //// 199 usec remote TCP latency over 100Mb/s //// ethernet. Beat that! //// -----------------------------------------////__________ o David S. Miller, davem@caip.rutgers.edu /_____________/ / // /_/ ><
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199705160732.DAA00547>