Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 00:27:01 +0100 (CET) From: Martin Blapp <mb@imp.ch> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems Message-ID: <20070226002323.V18301@godot.imp.ch> In-Reply-To: <20070225193128.GC77205@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20070224213111.GB41434@xor.obsecurity.org> <346a80220702242100i7ec22b5h4b25cc7d20d03e98@mail.gmail.com> <20070225054120.GA47059@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070225104709.S36322@fledge.watson.org> <20070225134508.C18301@godot.imp.ch> <20070225193128.GC77205@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, > If you can package up some kind of test or analogous workload that I > can run, I'd be happy to take a look at profiling it on MP hardware. > Should be possible. Btw. Has setting kern.threads.virtual_cpu to a different value effect for running programms or just started ones ? > > P.S. I assume you've done all the usual things like using libthr > instead of libpthread. Yes, all clamd installations we have run with libthr, since libptread is completly unusable and libc_r has small hangs from time to time. The question is just if this is a clamd problem or an threading library problem. -- Martin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070226002323.V18301>