From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 10 21:52:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 325E616A417 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:52:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arnej@pvv.ntnu.no) Received: from decibel.pvv.ntnu.no (decibel.pvv.ntnu.no [129.241.210.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C764B43D5A for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:52:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arnej@pvv.ntnu.no) Received: from arnej by decibel.pvv.ntnu.no with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GieIp-0005Iu-8N; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:52:47 +0100 Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:52:47 +0100 (CET) From: "Arne H. Juul" To: Nikos Ntarmos In-Reply-To: <20061110213313.GA72658@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> Message-ID: References: <20061110203714.GA89006@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> <20061110124459.M88944@turing> <20061110213313.GA72658@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance of Java on FBSD vs. others... X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:52:52 -0000 > I was using -Xms256m -Xmx1024m. Tried with -Xms1024m -Xmx1024m, again > without any noticeable difference. What's "top" look like after running this for a minute or two? You said you had 1G = 1024MB of RAM; trying to have a heap of 1024m you may be swapping like crazy, if so try with 600m to 800m. - Arne H. J.