From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Jan 23 14:33:21 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA16309
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 14:33:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cheops.anu.edu.au (avalon@cheops.anu.edu.au [150.203.76.24])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA16298
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 14:33:17 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199701232233.OAA16298@freefall.freebsd.org>
Received: by cheops.anu.edu.au
	(1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA255808786; Fri, 24 Jan 1997 09:33:07 +1100
From: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au>
Subject: Re: open up your (TCP) window (fwd)
To: scrappy@hub.org (The Hermit Hacker)
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 1997 09:33:06 +1100 (EDT)
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970123155605.14396I-100000@thelab.hub.org> from "The Hermit Hacker" at Jan 23, 97 03:58:57 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In some mail from The Hermit Hacker, sie said:
> 
> 
> Hopefully without starting a major debate *grin*...can anyone with a
> firm grasp of what this guy is asking for explain it to me?  About the
> only thing I can understand from this is that it seems that the FreeBSD
> box is isn't reading from the socket fast enough, or in large enough
> chunks?

Whatever software you're running that is receiving data is slow.

but, on the setsockopt() thread of late, was it setting SO_SNDBUF that was
overridden by the OS or SO_RCVBUF too ?

Darren