From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct  7 20:54:16 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58DD11065696
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  7 Oct 2008 20:54:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com)
Received: from shell.rawbw.com (shell.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4775D8FC26
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  7 Oct 2008 20:54:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com)
Received: from eagle.syrec.org (c-67-188-126-36.hsd1.ca.comcast.net
	[67.188.126.36]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by shell.rawbw.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m97Kt5S9063363
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:55:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <48EBCC75.1040908@rawbw.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 13:54:13 -0700
From: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20081001)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Strange memory/cpu behavior
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: yuri@rawbw.com
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 20:54:16 -0000

I have STABLE-71 machine with 2GB memory and single 2GHz AMD3200 CPU.

There is one large active process slowly growing in memory from 500MB to 
1300MB, not reading or writing any files.
There are many dormant processes almost not running at all.
Swap size remains constant (185MB). Total physical memory used remains 
2GB (whole memory used).

ps shows that the active process only takes 15-18% CPU. But total CPU 
consumption on the machine is 100% (user).

Since the active process grows but swap+physical memory doesn't grow I 
assume that OS pushes out other processes code since it's unchanged on disk.

Why such operation is so expensive and takes 80-85% CPU?
Why total of all user processes CPU consumption is ~20% but total 
CPU(user) consumption shows as 100%? Shouldn't they be the same.

Yuri