From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Mar 7 11:12:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from bingnet2.cc.binghamton.edu (bingnet2.cc.binghamton.edu [128.226.1.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1745D37B420 for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 11:12:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from onyx (onyx.cs.binghamton.edu [128.226.140.171]) by bingnet2.cc.binghamton.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g27JCNw21139; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 14:12:23 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 14:10:36 -0500 (EST) From: Zhihui Zhang X-Sender: zzhang@onyx To: Julian Elischer Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A question of VM page ownership In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The bogus page is owned by the system object, not by individual objects associated with the files. If a page could be owned by more than one objects, then we could let the object associated with a file to own the bogus page. -Zhihui On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > which one does the data come from? > > On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Zhihui Zhang wrote: > > > > > Is there any fundamental reason why a page can not be owned by more than > > one VM object? If that was the case, the bogus page stuff in vfs_bio.c > > could be made cleaner IMHO. > > > > -Zhihui > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message