From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Dec 11 14:56:05 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1EEF16A4E8
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:56:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E0D43D3C
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:02:59 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from julian@elischer.org)
Received: from interjet.elischer.org ([24.7.73.28])
          by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP
          id <2003121122025601300bp26pe>; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 22:02:56 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1])
	by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA89151;
	Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:02:54 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:02:53 -0800 (PST)
From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com>
In-Reply-To: <3FD8E6CD.9070006@tenebras.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0312111402260.86730-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
cc: Hussain Ali <hali@ttsg.com>
Subject: Re: grouping 2 or more interfaces as 1
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 22:56:06 -0000



On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Michael Sierchio wrote:

> Julian Elischer wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, kfl wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >>Look into bridge(4).
> > 
> > 
> > more likely he wants something like ng_fec or ng_one2many
> 
> Unless performance is the reason for bonding the ether channels...
> 
> Can't we steal the Linux code? ;-)

is the netgraph version particularly slow?


> 
> 
>