From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 21:28:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12641106566B for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 21:28:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-fs@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C291C8FC21 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 21:28:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q6rKJ-0005to-BX for freebsd-fs@freebsd.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 23:28:47 +0200 Received: from 195.225.157.86 ([195.225.157.86]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 23:28:47 +0200 Received: from c.kworr by 195.225.157.86 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 23:28:47 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org From: Volodymyr Kostyrko Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 00:28:31 +0300 Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <4D99DDB0.9090307@googlemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.225.157.86 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; uk-UA; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110306 Thunderbird/3.1.9 In-Reply-To: <4D99DDB0.9090307@googlemail.com> Subject: Re: zfs porting roadmap? X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 21:28:50 -0000 04.04.2011 18:03, Lukas Rössler написав(ла): > I browsed through the archives of the past few months and saw that zfs > is already ported up to v28 atm (thanks a lot at pjd - you do awesome > work!). > > Don't get me wrong here, i don't want to sound demanding in any way, i'm > just interested - are there plans to port it up to the current version > (31, i believe)? The killer feature for me is encryption, which was > added in v30... For me the real killing feature would be import of better compressor like snappy or bmdiff. I'd really vote for snappy, because: 1. It beats LZO at compression speed holding tight on decompression. It also beats all other compression algorithms we currently have for ZFS. 2. It has BSD-style license. -- Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.