From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jan 27 11:38:32 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA29470 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 11:38:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from servo.ccr.org (servo.ccr.org [198.3.0.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA29462 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 11:38:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mo@servo.ccr.org) Received: from servo.ccr.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by servo.ccr.org (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id OAA50778 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 14:38:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mo@servo.ccr.org) Message-Id: <199901271938.OAA50778@servo.ccr.org> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: "Argument by Authority" Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 14:38:23 -0500 From: "Mike O'Dell" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG just for a calibration, i asked Dennis Ritchie his opinion of "the right behavior" his comment about posix might be the trump card, although i'd like to see chapter and verse if that's the case. for what it's worth. -mo ------- Forwarded Message MessageName: (Message 47) From: dmr@plan9.bell-labs.com Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 14:30:59 -0500 To: mo@servo.ccr.org Well the research systems from v7 (just looked) through Brazil produce no diagnostic. So much for "should." Irix complains, suppressible with -f. I wonder if it's in posix? Dennis ------- End of Forwarded Message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message