From owner-freebsd-doc Sun Feb 25 2:57:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk (nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk [193.237.89.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CBE937B401; Sun, 25 Feb 2001 02:57:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk) Received: (from nik@localhost) by nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f1PAxtD71199; Sun, 25 Feb 2001 10:59:55 GMT (envelope-from nik) Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 10:59:51 +0000 From: Nik Clayton To: John Baldwin Cc: Nik Clayton , andreas@FreeBSD.org, doc@FreeBSD.org, jkh@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docproj depends on X11 now?!?! Message-ID: <20010225105947.A68522@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> References: <20010224230908.C64525@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from jhb@FreeBSD.org on Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 03:55:40PM -0800 Organization: FreeBSD Project Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 03:55:40PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 24-Feb-01 Nik Clayton wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 02:23:10PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote: > >> Woah. I was building a test release with DOCS turned on and happened to > >> look > >> over and saw that it was installing the XFree86 3.3.6 port due to a > >> dependency > >> on libpng. Which is an interactive port. Which makes release not be > >> non-interactive anymore. This needs to be fixed, esp. before it comes time > >> to > >> rolling 4.3. > > > > jasone on #fightclub just told me that Ghostscript turns on the X11 > > display device by default. > > > > Andreas, with your MAINTAINER hat on, could we patch the ghostscript6 port > > so that it asks whether or not the end user needs the X11 support included > > or not, and adjust the patches and dependencies as necessary? > > > > I'm happy to do the work for this. > > Eek! Please don't make it ask. Or rather, provide a variable I can set in the > environment that release can use to make it just DTRT w/o asking the user > anything. release needs to be non-interactive. :) My current thinking is a slave port, ghostscript6-nox11 that eps2png can depend on instead. There are other options (a WITH_X11 variable, that sort of thing) that various people on irc have suggested as well. Not being a prolific porter, I'm going to go with whatever's easiest for me to implement (viz, a slave port) unless people have specific objections (or they want to write the code). Thoughts? N -- Internet connection, $19.95 a month. Computer, $799.95. Modem, $149.95. Telephone line, $24.95 a month. Software, free. USENET transmission, hundreds if not thousands of dollars. Thinking before posting, priceless. Somethings in life you can't buy. For everything else, there's MasterCard. -- Graham Reed, in the Scary Devil Monastery To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message