Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 14:34:52 +0200 From: Damien Fleuriot <ml@my.gd> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is this something we (as consumers of FreeBSD) need to be aware of? Message-ID: <4FCF4E6C.5090300@my.gd> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206051952510.59814@tripel.monochrome.org> References: <CADy1Ce7MihpmMowc265%2BS_RKorMO3KEKsCgr=pdnjg2jzq-dYQ@mail.gmail.com> <20120605221250.9da6bd5c.goksin.akdeniz@gmail.com> <4FCE61D4.9070300@cran.org.uk> <20120605230025.a1e39827.goksin.akdeniz@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206051952510.59814@tripel.monochrome.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/6/12 1:57 AM, Chris Hill wrote: > On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, G?k?in Akdeniz wrote: > >> For the time being only ARM platform is restricted. > > True, but I would be astonished if this restriction were not expanded by > MS in the future. Just my opinion, but I believe their ultimate goal is > to add platforms until the "secure boot" restriction encompasses most or > all desktop and server hardware. This would be over a period of years. > I direct you to an older version of the matrix, where microsoft was discussing Paladium and TCPA. These are the exact same. And these are a liberty killer. http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/tcpa-faq.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FCF4E6C.5090300>