Date: Fri, 9 Feb 1996 20:11:57 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: cimaxp1!jb@werple.net.au (John Birrell) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, jb@cimlogic.com.au Subject: Re: POSIX 1003.1b compliance (timespec revisited) Message-ID: <199602100311.UAA13389@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199602092229.JAA18304@werple.net.au> from "John Birrell" at Feb 10, 96 09:28:38 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I recently posted a note to this list about the FreeBSD definition of > timespec and the fact that it does not comply with IEEE 1003.1b-1993. > I noted that NetBSD was about to make the change. Well the NetBSD change > has happened and has found its way to at least a mirror at this end of the > earth. So how about making the change to FreeBSD too? These structures are everywhere. 8-(. Not to mention that "time" in kernel.h is referenced directly instead of via a macro. 8-(. The cleanup on these things should probably wait until after David Greenman integrates the Lite2 code. I think NetBSD did this some time ago. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199602100311.UAA13389>