From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Thu Jan 21 16:34:30 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69512A8C1CF; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 16:34:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crest@rlwinm.de) Received: from smtp.rlwinm.de (smtp.rlwinm.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:201:31ef::e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38DA21AA7; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 16:34:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crest@rlwinm.de) Received: from crest.local (unknown [87.253.189.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.rlwinm.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 31CEAF930; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 17:34:27 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: IoT OS To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: From: Jan Bramkamp Message-ID: <56A10892.2090308@rlwinm.de> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 17:34:26 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 16:34:30 -0000 On 21/01/16 17:19, Mathieu Prevot wrote: > Dear all, > > I would like to connect several connected object (with homogeneous or > heterogenous hardare: intel edison, samsung artik, apple AX, intel core, > etc) so the calculation needs, the storage/memory, the connection, etc are > decoupled; hence we can reach an ecosystem with several clouds. > > How do you recommend to reach that ? from the kernel, a module, or > eventually a software ? Your message contains neither enough information nor a precise enough question for anyone to provide you a helpful answer. Please describe your problem in sufficient detail and reformulate your question. If you still think these mailing lists (current@ and hackers@) are a good audience for your question afterward ask them again.