From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 29 09:04:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC26A35F for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:04:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.scaleengine.net (beauharnois2.bhs1.scaleengine.net [142.4.218.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6AEE991 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:04:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.0.139] (unknown [92.247.20.226]) (Authenticated sender: allanjude.freebsd@scaleengine.com) by mx1.scaleengine.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1067B54E5D for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:04:30 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5429209C.6020402@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 05:04:28 -0400 From: Allan Jude User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mesa-9: configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables References: <7b0a119ebc4d8d7813f92c0f94aba8d8.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> <542882B7.4060407@freebsd.org> <82259777bbe474bb5581c2b4a0b79f25.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> <54288C32.3080201@freebsd.org> <55ea1654e68d865f7becfa4bf57474c3.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> <26670d7976dc83f6afaf63577f6c114d.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> <411fc42685f5deb5ca9cf02374fc531a.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> In-Reply-To: <411fc42685f5deb5ca9cf02374fc531a.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:04:33 -0000 On 2014-09-28 23:15, Chris H wrote: > > Die clang, die! > > --Chris So yes, that port requires newer GCC than is in base (die GPLv3, die) I am not sure why the conditional was not causing the dependency on ports gcc to fire correctly, or why that makefile was explicitly setting cc=clang As long as your issue is solved, best of luck, but really, embrace the clang, the clang is your friend. Long live clang. -- Allan Jude