From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Oct 25 19:32:44 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318C8429;
 Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:32:44 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from crees@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.135])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D4B8FC14;
 Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:32:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q9PJWh58097536;
 Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:32:43 GMT
 (envelope-from crees@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from crees@localhost)
 by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q9PJWhPk097532;
 Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:32:43 GMT (envelope-from crees)
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:32:43 GMT
Message-Id: <201210251932.q9PJWhPk097532@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: eugene@donpac.ru, crees@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org
From: crees@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: conf/105689: [ppp] [request] syslogd starts too late at boot
X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation."
 <freebsd-rc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-rc>,
 <mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-rc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-rc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-rc>,
 <mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:32:44 -0000

Synopsis: [ppp] [request] syslogd starts too late at boot

State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: crees
State-Changed-When: Thu Oct 25 19:32:43 UTC 2012
State-Changed-Why: 
I believe there's a chicken/egg problem here.  What if syslogd was on a
remote machine that ppp was required for?  Personally I think this risk
is greater than the benefit from adding REQUIRE: syslogd to ppp.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=105689