From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 16 17:01:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F132106566B for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:01:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mail.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [212.204.60.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2E408FC24 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:01:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mobileKamikaze.norad (unknown [92.117.233.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D56D58A0816; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:01:06 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <480630CF.4020907@bsdforen.de> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:01:03 +0200 From: Dominic Fandrey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080413) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?U8OpYmFzdGllbiBNb3JhbmQ=?= References: <16d3abd60804010444q3936889m436e979276f23ad8@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <16d3abd60804010444q3936889m436e979276f23ad8@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD installation on AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:01:09 -0000 S=C3=A9bastien Morand wrote: > Hi, >=20 > ... >=20 > So before reinstalling everything, I'd like to know : > Is it a reasonable choice (in terme of performance, reliability, and > compatibility terms) to install i386 over amd64 arch? For a desktop i386 is still the better choice and unless you have more th= an 3G=20 of RAM there are no downsides, but many advantages. E.g. acpi sleep state= s are=20 only implemented for i386. I'm running amd64 on my notebook and the price= is=20 high. No suspend to ram or to disk (even though I have s4bios support), a= nd=20 not even cpu stepping (at least not the clock speed stepping only idle ca= lls=20 and they make /no/ difference at all). All these things would work if I ran i386, but I want to be there when th= ey=20 start working on amd64.