Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 18:11:19 +1030 From: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> To: Sean-Paul Rees <sean@flame.org>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 3.1-S and /lkm Message-ID: <19990324181119.G425@lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.05.9903232124370.14471-100000@kechara.flame.org>; from Sean-Paul Rees on Tue, Mar 23, 1999 at 09:25:54PM -0800 References: <Pine.NEB.4.05.9903232124370.14471-100000@kechara.flame.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday, 23 March 1999 at 21:25:54 -0800, Sean-Paul Rees wrote: > I noticed that /lkm hasn't been touched since the day I installed FreeBSD > 3.0-R. Since then, I've upgraded to 3.1-S, and was wondering if I still > needed /lkm, over /modules. I believe there are a couple of commercial lkms out there which are supplied in binary form only. If you have one of them, you'll obviously need it. Otherwise, klds are the way to go. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address, home page and phone numbers finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990324181119.G425>