From owner-freebsd-security Sat Feb 1 2: 1:45 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3D6537B401 for ; Sat, 1 Feb 2003 02:01:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl (smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB1A643F79 for ; Sat, 1 Feb 2003 02:01:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from steendijk@xs4all.nl) Received: from xs4all.nl (beware.xs4all.nl [80.126.79.169]) by smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id h11A1diG048314 for ; Sat, 1 Feb 2003 11:01:40 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <3E3B9B03.6ACE7B96@xs4all.nl> Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2003 11:01:39 +0100 From: bas X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: krb5-realm.com References: <3E3B1D71.21CFBD42@ursine.com> <20030201015129.GA27949@rfc822.net> <20030131181815.A42597@greg.cex.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org isnt it a bad thing if every sshd on the world ends up contacting krb5-realm.com by default? is this also true for newer versions of sshd (with kerberos disabled)? i mean it may make the owners of krb5-realm.com powerful beings. sounds a bit .NET to me. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message