Date: Mon, 1 Jul 1996 14:53:10 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: fenner@parc.xerox.com (Bill Fenner) Cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: socketpair bug? Message-ID: <199607012153.OAA06625@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <96Jun30.222423pdt.177476@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> from "Bill Fenner" at Jun 30, 96 10:24:20 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> In message <199606271813.UAA02652@uriah.heep.sax.de> you write: > >See also my Usenet reply: socketpair() basically needs a similar libc > >syscall wrapper like pipe(). Right now, it uses the generic syscall > >wrapper which is wrong. (The XXX??'s can be removed again then. :) > > I think the answer is the other way around -- socketpair() works as it > is and just needs the two XXX'd lines removed, no need for it to have a > wrapper like pipe(). > > We went through this a while ago and I don't remember the outcome > (except, of course, that I didn't commit anything, but that's probably > just because I'm lazy) How do you put a wrapper in a foreign libc? Like a statically compiled SCO or BSDI or Linux binary? Or even a shared library using binary, without building the shared library (how do you do that for SCO?)? Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199607012153.OAA06625>