From owner-freebsd-current Thu Feb 13 21:27:51 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8E337B401 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 21:27:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from pennasoft.com (pennasoft.com [192.220.103.128]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9653443FA3 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 21:27:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@pennasoft.com) Received: (qmail 44154 invoked by uid 26496); 14 Feb 2003 05:27:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO browning.pennasoft.com) ([192.220.103.128]) (envelope-sender ) by 192.220.103.128 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 14 Feb 2003 05:27:49 -0000 From: Chris BeHanna Organization: PennaSoft Corporation To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5-STABLE Roadmap Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 00:28:21 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <200302140036.h1E0aK3q071051@freefall.freebsd.org> <25c301c2d3e1$8f2e3e30$52557f42@errno.com> In-Reply-To: <25c301c2d3e1$8f2e3e30$52557f42@errno.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200302140028.21669.chris@pennasoft.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thursday 13 February 2003 11:28 pm, Sam Leffler wrote: > > At 4:36 PM -0800 2003/02/13, Scott Long wrote: > > > - the classic 'worldstone' > > > - webstone - /usr/ports/www/webstone > > > - Fstress - http://www.cs.duke.edu/ari/fstress > > > - ApacheBench - /usr/ports/www/p5-ApacheBench > > > - netperf - /usr/ports/benchmarks/netperf > > > > Are there any other benchmarks that are being considered? What > > about LMBench? RawIO? Bonnie++? Other disk benchmarks? Do we care > > about application-layer benchmarks for other protocols, such as SMTP, > > POP3, or IMAP? > > > > Just curious. Thanks! > > This can quickly turn into a bikeshed, but suggest ones. We're looking for > good benchmarks. lmbench, rawio, and bonniee are rather "micro" in nature > (not bad, just limited in their usefulness). SpecFS (NFS ops/sec benchmark) -- Chris BeHanna http://www.pennasoft.com Principal Consultant PennaSoft Corporation chris@pennasoft.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message