Date: 08 Aug 2000 16:51:34 -0500 From: Lars Eighner <eighner@io.com> To: j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org> Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: unix filesystem structure Message-ID: <86lmy7a0bd.fsf@dumpster.io.com> In-Reply-To: j mckitrick's message of "Tue, 8 Aug 2000 20:22:39 %2B0100" References: <20000808202239.A21332@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In our last episode, <20000808202239.A21332@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>, the lovely and talented j mckitrick jm> is there any advantage to the unix filesystem structure, keeping jm> all binaries together, all docs together, all config files jm> together, etc, rather than the modern method of keeping all the jm> parts of a given application together? How long does your path become with the "modern" method? -- Lars Eighner eighner@io.com http://www.io.com/~eighner/ God is REAL, unless explicitly declared INTEGER. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86lmy7a0bd.fsf>