From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 22 23:10:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E02106566B for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 23:10:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328998FC15 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 23:10:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so2228673wye.13 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:10:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bgOlpcD33W1qgwOyvCq+RNebtcJTLNKJJy5ODiarb7I=; b=aD4OFxvq8AgSE9VVynC1MoViCToSbB7v7TI9gokYiLwYTY5jKHrJa4WJpclQnU1RKD 2iUJKE/QvZaHJAYaidGNz2Jaj5HJy82J0NuYnC1ZwZ0APEacw6tVH1TfIsGrfIjoi0sW EbZVi5PDwnafvIyNFQxGfovEmKB0sCKoJbSmw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=FnQJEsu+dUJm4S5zAuGUZEsA4JlhpzTcsximwpccF9bpvvBXEJhxIQFu/E6lDdx6vt MNgGeR5CY1KIUoUJC1nMmdkK1ggnLCgs0HlrT6OK/xQnWnSzmA+u5g0DjZHssANnuGXi A0vGS64hLOr0X5CN8dSkYsgq+m5APuBTuqOws= Received: by 10.216.90.141 with SMTP id e13mr1203337wef.166.1271977828765; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:10:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m5sm717178gve.10.2010.04.22.16.10.27 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:10:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 00:10:25 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100423001025.3138d003@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.7; i386-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Portsnap metadata is correctly signed, but contains at least one line which appears bogus. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 23:10:30 -0000 On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:32:23 +0300 Eitan Adler wrote: > I've been getting the following message a lot lately. > > Portsnap metadata is correctly signed, but contains > at least one line which appears bogus. > > I've used the following command in the past to fix the error but it > didn't work this time. > find /var/db/portsnap/ -newerct "1 day ago" -delete If the metadata is correctly signed then it sounds like it should be a server-side problem. OTOH no-one else is mentioning it, are you running portsnap from a reasonably recent release? It might be instructive to edit portsnap, look for the places where fetch_metadata_freakout is called and have it make a copy of the offending file.