From nobody Sat Aug 27 12:32:42 2022 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4MFGMG1Zdwz4ZKvq for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 12:33:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from micadeyeye@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf1-x12c.google.com (mail-lf1-x12c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MFGMF3tLsz3FZs for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 12:33:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from micadeyeye@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id bq23so5230318lfb.7 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 05:33:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc; bh=b1pDxCcJWkmqyVl0WCqyGLHlKHSBVQI/WeiitRRJFI8=; b=QIdSv2Fmdn4pXZExkK+vksZZ0UT+z3Br7DGnPIIHWyXKAn4S3LFecTGzGeA5TRoOCz zeBVjX2mKkooVkepsYIdiYVE+UDjNKX1XBUiMe7UvWmegeC3UTJ9JORGVkx0EuWjbTsD pFUTKgznGQb2CQxQUSZ8GCqtWxR9ouSwB3heMra7GsCJxzpPU0IPWCpt3CKoAhnsimfV fE274kmOfB3O05hQSklwuQMO57Z8mTJz+OxI88BZ54gNoMACA+ShwU+Fn/JXHg9WE33c ljDX4xB8vqHjnkkaKAUoA0KA5Ew8Z6HZGlCs07g4jlE0xc67/SUQzL4S2DPn5NwURhyw wqrQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=b1pDxCcJWkmqyVl0WCqyGLHlKHSBVQI/WeiitRRJFI8=; b=5utWE68SkMqAbIdsnjsYE1bIIJB4V6cKs2dp/ZR5NXquti5emTVeuM6WeqduUzg7AO pIRXAc/2y05B4U0FIaUcSJTaPqZeqaOdMHvgeKt9uHWFQdwiGeX4ENsJ51rSpFR6StCo ECpoxfPfm4hCUSdvXSgNoz1rg6lu7KK/uBnuf8J4QwWm7EaOY+vK3z8NmHuOqnoR02yS qgVkd65aAYSZuvldvwfg7wAsizU3IvVI9LeutJFGIruCeb4DmIddHXflt2YH9bY1Vru+ g65Zckt5ndxO2WUgRMLoMHBaGYzyIBObUxa25xqJMumFd8KMbMHhiQs/dEdGZgwMrI2Q XsUA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2nZGxxUBkSWxrUuXBa6joOKNoS3dXrzuXRuOnfH0dt66GnvTVF UxgVV83lrVu8PnL88TnzRemxaWSwnUHig4M3aM88ITH6 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4zVoUTvquNZ1naK0/lWrVAh5OP2FfRbnPHtg5bqHBYL8fdUOGYS+FEApj+kZPKglmDATphwg7iJhB4Ki2Nazc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:c26:b0:492:dafd:1440 with SMTP id z38-20020a0565120c2600b00492dafd1440mr3532786lfu.200.1661603591664; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 05:33:11 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1062387933.146.1661491191507@localhost> <1126283524.90.1661501545184@localhost> <20220827093143.tg5ixmebpvqeik56@nexus.home.palmen-it.de> In-Reply-To: <20220827093143.tg5ixmebpvqeik56@nexus.home.palmen-it.de> From: "Michael A. Oshin" Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2022 20:32:42 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: New Port: Security/liblurch & Security/Pidgin-lurch To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d6b7ee05e7383bb3" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4MFGMF3tLsz3FZs X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=QIdSv2Fm; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of micadeyeye@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::12c as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=micadeyeye@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.95 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.996]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.995]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.96)[-0.961]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20210112]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::12c:from]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N --000000000000d6b7ee05e7383bb3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Sat, Aug 27, 2022, 17:31 Felix Palmen wrote: > * Michael A. Oshin [20220827 17:26]: > > Thanks everyone. I missed those reply because I subscribed to a daily > > digest. > > I took you on CC now. Please also consider my other answers I added to > the list only. > >Thanks Felix for your inputs. I shall merge them and run the patch. It was also suggested to change the category to net-im despite saying that pidgin-otr and libotr were in the security category and that these ports were based on that choice. Maybe, pidgin-lurch & liblurch go to net-im while libomemo etc remain in the security category. > > > I shall drop the use GH then, @Cy had earlier recommended it. > > To clarify: In general, explicit distfiles prepared by upstream are > preferred if available. Sometimes, these distfiles introduce problems in > which case USE_GITHUB is preferred nevertheless. > > Thanks for the further clarification. > > I don't see such a problem with the distfile here, but maybe Cy can > clarify ;) > > Cheers, Felix > > -- > Felix Palmen {private} felix@palmen-it.de > -- ports committer (mentee) -- {web} http://palmen-it.de > {pgp public key} http://palmen-it.de/pub.txt > {pgp fingerprint} 6936 13D5 5BBF 4837 B212 3ACC 54AD E006 9879 F231 > --000000000000d6b7ee05e7383bb3 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Sat, Aug 27, 2022, 17:31 Felix Palmen <zirias@freebsd.org> wrote:
<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px= #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">* Michael A. Oshin <micadeyeye@gmail.com= > [20220827 17:26]:
> Thanks everyone. I missed those reply because I subscribed to a daily<= br> > digest.

I took you on CC now. Please also consider my other answers I added to
the list only.
>Thanks Fel= ix for your inputs. I shall merge them and run the patch. It was also sugge= sted to change the category to net-im despite saying that pidgin-otr and li= botr were in the security category and that these ports were based on that = choice. Maybe, pidgin-lurch & liblurch go to net-im while libomemo etc = remain in the security category.

> I shall drop the use GH then, @Cy had earlier recommended it.

To clarify: In general, explicit distfiles prepared by upstream are
preferred if available. Sometimes, these distfiles introduce problems in which case USE_GITHUB is preferred nevertheless.
> Thanks for the further clarification.=C2=A0
<= div dir=3D"auto">

I don't see such a problem with the distfile here, but maybe Cy can
clarify ;)

Cheers, Felix

--
=C2=A0Felix Palmen <zirias@FreeBSD.org>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0{private}= =C2=A0 =C2=A0felix@palmen-it.de
=C2=A0-- ports committer (mentee) --=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 {web}=C2=A0 http://palmen-it.de
=C2=A0{pgp public key}=C2=A0 http://palmen-it.de/pub.txt =C2=A0{pgp fingerprint} 6936 13D5 5BBF 4837 B212=C2=A0 3ACC 54AD E006 9879 = F231
--000000000000d6b7ee05e7383bb3--