Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 14:40:57 +0300 From: Roman Jemets <r.jemets@ts.ee> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2 NICs Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.19990428144057.00b25100@vegas> In-Reply-To: <4.1.19990428185923.041ffa80@admin.ibahn.net> References: <3.0.5.32.19990428103136.00a58a10@relay.alice.it> <4.1.19990428143537.03d1f4c0@admin.ibahn.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 19:27 28.04.99 +0800, you wrote: They are connected to one physical ethernet segment, aren't they? That's why ARP may get confused by sending ARP request from one interface and then receive it to second one back, I guess. >The NICs have different IPs assigned to them. > > >xl0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > inet 10.177.1.233 netmask 0xfffffffc broadcast 10.177.1.235 > ether 00:10:5a:6c:f0:1f > media: 10baseT/UTP <half-duplex> > supported media: autoselect 100baseTX <full-duplex> 100baseTX ><half-dupl >ex> 100baseTX 10baseT/UTP <full-duplex> 10baseT/UTP <half-duplex> 10baseT/UTP >xl1: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > inet 10.19.254.6 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.19.254.255 > ether 00:10:4b:79:2a:4a > media: 10baseT/UTP <half-duplex> > supported media: autoselect 100baseTX <full-duplex> 100baseTX ><half-dupl >ex> 100baseTX 10baseT/UTP <full-duplex> 10baseT/UTP <half-duplex> 10baseT/UTP To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3.0.6.32.19990428144057.00b25100>