From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 6 13:49:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EDC21065693; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 13:49:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2452C8FC18; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 13:49:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C411FFC22; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 13:49:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1EB7C8448E; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 14:49:43 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Stanislav Sedov References: <201001040916.o049GZ1Y013061@svn.freebsd.org> <4B4384E3.2080600@FreeBSD.org> <20100105152300.eb7a66d1.stas@FreeBSD.org> <4B43D346.4020900@FreeBSD.org> <20100105162447.7deac6d7.stas@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 14:49:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20100105162447.7deac6d7.stas@FreeBSD.org> (Stanislav Sedov's message of "Tue, 5 Jan 2010 16:24:47 -0800") Message-ID: <86fx6jgx6x.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.95 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Doug Barton , src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r201477 - head/games/fortune/datfiles X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 13:49:44 -0000 Stanislav Sedov writes: > Hmm, I'm not by any means the English language expert [just learning], > but isn't "invasion of" in this context is somewhat vague? I mean, > from what I see from dictionaries "invasion of smth" could mean both > the action by smth, and action against smth. Is "invasion to" > grammatically incorrect? Either "the invasion of Iraq by the US" or "the US invasion of Iraq". Never "to". DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no