From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 31 11:52:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06185106566B; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:52:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stb@lassitu.de) Received: from koef.zs64.net (koef.zs64.net [212.12.50.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F6698FC17; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:52:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stb@lassitu.de) Received: from localhost by koef.zs64.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n6VBqNwE069791 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:52:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from stb@lassitu.de) (authenticated as stb) Message-Id: From: Stefan Bethke To: Qing Li , Julian Elischer In-Reply-To: <4A721160.5080902@elischer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:52:23 +0200 References: <4A709126.5050102@elischer.org><3A1518B9-2C8C-4F05-9195-82C6017E4902@lassitu.de> <4A721160.5080902@elischer.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) Cc: Matthias Andree , FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: recent change to ifconfig breaks OpenVPN? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:52:29 -0000 I wrote: > Setting net.link.ether.inet.useloopback=0 does not restore the > previous behavior. Li, Qing wrote: > > I also verified setting (useloopback=0) * does * restore to the > previous behavior. I apologize. I tested again, and setting net.link.ether.inet.useloopback=0 does indeed restore previous behavior, and is a valid workaround for running OpenVPN unchanged. Matthias, you might want to have a notice to that effect added to the port for the time being. I agree that assigning the same address to both the local and the remote address of a p2p link is not really sensible, and will try to come up with a patch to OpenVPN. Thanks for the clarification and insight, Stefan -- Stefan Bethke Fon +49 151 14070811