From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Dec 24 18:01:32 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CBAB16A418
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 24 Dec 2007 18:01:32 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B1913C4D3;
	Mon, 24 Dec 2007 18:01:31 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <476FF3FA.9020803@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 19:01:30 +0100
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bengt Ahlgren <bengta@sics.se>
References: <uh77ijh86l3.fsf@P142.sics.se>
In-Reply-To: <uh77ijh86l3.fsf@P142.sics.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 6.3-RC1: different port/package versions
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 18:01:32 -0000

Bengt Ahlgren wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> I'm trying out 6.3-RC1, but had some problems with getting different
> (and incompatible) versions of packages and ports.
> 
> When installing packages with sysinstall via FTP, i get older versions
> compared to using pkg_add -r.  The latter (correctly) takes the
> packages from the packages-6.3-release directory, but sysinstall seems
> to take the (older) in packages-6-stable.  In the sysinstall options,
> setting "Release Name" to 6.3-RELEASE only results in that it says
> that the directory does not exist on the FTP server.
> 
> Is this expected behaviour?

Yes, sysinstall hadn't yet been changed to point to the release 
directory, which was only recently created.

Kris