From owner-freebsd-questions  Tue Oct 12 18:49:45 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com (cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com [24.2.89.207])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AF7D14E64
	for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 12 Oct 1999 18:49:41 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from cjc@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com)
Received: (from cjc@localhost)
	by cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA35762;
	Tue, 12 Oct 1999 21:52:44 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from cjc)
From: "Crist J. Clark" <cjc@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com>
Message-Id: <199910130152.VAA35762@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com>
Subject: Re: nslookup on Freebsd 2.X and Freebsd 3.2
In-Reply-To: <380371CA.4865@sofrecom.fr> from yveline josserand at "Oct 12, 1999 06:37:14 pm"
To: yveline.josserand@sofrecom.fr
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 21:52:44 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Reply-To: cjclark@home.com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

yveline josserand wrote,
> Good Evening
> 
> I'm running freebsd 3.2. When I type:
> 
> 	nslookup
> 	 I have the following message
> 
> 	Default Server:  localhost.sofrecom.fr
> 	Address:  127.0.0.1
> 
> 	>aaa.sofrecom.fr
>  
> 	> Server:  localhost.sofrecom.fr
> 	Address:  127.0.0.1
>  
> 	Name:    aaa.sofrecom.fr.sofrecom.fr
> 
> aaa isn't defined on my system

It's somewhat hard to understand this. What _exactly_ does it say?
Does it say something after the "Name:" line?

> If I'm running freebsd 2.X and I type the same command:
> 
> 	nslookup 
> 	 I have the following message
> 
> 	Default Server:  localhost.sofrecom.fr
> 	Address:  127.0.0.1
> 	
> 	>aaa.sofrecom.fr
>  
> 	> Server:  localhost.sofrecom.fr
> 	Address:  127.0.0.1
> 
> 	*** localhost.sofrecom.fr can't find aaa.sofrecom.fr:
> 	Non-existent host-domain 
> 
> Here also, aaa isn't defined. Why with freebsd 3.2 I don't have
> the same behaviour that in freebsd 2.X. Is somebody has an idea?
> May I have something else to configure to have the same result ?

What does your named.boot on the 2.x.x system look like and the
named.conf on the 3.2?
-- 
Crist J. Clark                           cjclark@home.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message