From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 10 00:49:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B6C616A407 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 00:49:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91EE643D64 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 00:49:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k3A0mMqm027189; Sun, 9 Apr 2006 18:48:22 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2006 18:48:25 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20060409.184825.99254285.imp@bsdimp.com> To: bms@spc.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20060409090757.GW80492@spc.org> References: <44383346.2030207@samsco.org> <17464.16087.217524.843667@bhuda.mired.org> <20060409090757.GW80492@spc.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: mwm-keyword-freebsdhackers.102a7e@mired.org, scottl@samsco.org, ceri@submonkey.net, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using any network interface whatsoever X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 00:49:42 -0000 In message: <20060409090757.GW80492@spc.org> Bruce M Simpson writes: : What it really comes down to is that one needs a PCI variant which supports : what's known as 'geographical addressing', and for FreeBSD's device / ifnet : framework to support naming cards according to the geographic i.e. physical : address. I though thtis was already supported. We export bus/slot/function information devd, which can be used to configure the device. : Unfortunately the only systems which tend to implement this feature at : the moment are CompactPCI based chassis systems. Although there is support : for geographical addressing in a recent ACPI spec but as far as I know : it may only really have made its way into blade systems. How is this different than bus/slot/function? Warner