From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Fri Feb 5 16:31:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91969A9BF51; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 16:31:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-x22c.google.com (mail-ig0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D737E3E; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 16:31:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ig0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id rs20so44187560igc.0; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 08:31:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=CVkMYG99vEPirn3IUoO1Q9Ikk8Jy/mWtYJ4R6ISC2Q4=; b=tFkNO/VDkVEzUYPB8FH0EcVLvxg5UFl3wrY/XxZO2X4cZgJ8olsSvJFDZVU1LCHnFv whaVIT/tg7LSpLC/duAhWn+xskTa33C4KOAHhlfB5JZ33QsQr0+j/GlrlmTC/gYwX2O/ 0V+hGSJabiqSAYYprgS1ZMNzPdmzvj+mR6SyD0HOHmNRlQ5NQgZ0y0RxDjd5MVf7G9Y0 39RY86veW1QPQ10cIohQNNWtRxGNEt7gA0Dk0KrFwrGVXmNHw2Areu7ncUSEJq0dkBnN Oi4W8Sy3I2PDOn0/FCWFR9IJWwJeOe940sqGy7GrQKW+vEUUXP9ITPqf6n3TS7TbTrw8 jESA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=CVkMYG99vEPirn3IUoO1Q9Ikk8Jy/mWtYJ4R6ISC2Q4=; b=jiLCbz8tw+zEqaVjFR+IsHLhxeahtujG7poaKwOELsjXQ2HIoPi5WLQyr5+5YBwWi7 79li0ElYAkc4iVxyNgTAGcCJfKoGWOtCvkt43PiASChRzGSANRVTQT+1ptEA3U0od4A+ yTTLeKZyeQPTpv3+fIrI5FXQ9qsRq3RrdZs1aQ9TVyJDgs3FWilK1/5tERO8oriej3P2 AFlBeK94V8dELGHBNaw9jzIspycFMmhxEAw6hPjoyaAwgMWw4leiRVYCD0MriSZdNAwD RfrY+Fd75P0aw7UprDtgB4aXjc0gwvk0g8EaOoLkFf641DIX3kCx6IFlbTAg8PsyFor3 YJYA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOS5k8zTKjcUCtKpM2AdoZxrr3FIdw6s7CJiE8S3plMADcH9cl+oBttDcgw7TwzSR0Ty3K/+5feh6a8Z8Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.93.36 with SMTP id cr4mr15602362igb.22.1454689896811; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 08:31:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.14.19 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 08:31:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 08:31:36 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Request for testing bus_get_bus_tag() nexus method From: Adrian Chadd To: Marcin Mazurek Cc: freebsd-current , "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD PowerPC ML , "freebsd-mips@freebsd.org" , Zbigniew Bodek Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 16:31:37 -0000 hi, you can run mips and powerpc inside qemu emulators. There's no reason to not test it! -adrian On 5 February 2016 at 08:11, Marcin Mazurek wrote: > Hello, > > I am looking for testers for a patch to add BUS_GET_BUS_TAG method to some > platforms nexus that return per platform specific default tag. > > It works fine on arm, but I do not have any powerpc or mips hardware to > test it on, > so I would like it if this could be tested on these platforms using this > code to check > if it does not break them. > > Any comments and feedback are welcome. > > Thanks, > Marcin > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-mips@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mips > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-mips-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"