From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Apr 26 17:15:12 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from earth.backplane.com (earth-nat-cw.backplane.com [208.161.114.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C2137B422; Thu, 26 Apr 2001 17:15:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@earth.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by earth.backplane.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f3R0FAi62512; Thu, 26 Apr 2001 17:15:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 17:15:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Matt Dillon Message-Id: <200104270015.f3R0FAi62512@earth.backplane.com> To: "David O'Brien" Cc: Julian Elischer , Arch@FreeBSD.ORG, Daniel Eischen Subject: Re: KSE threading support (first parts) References: <3AE71067.FF4BD029@elischer.org> <20010425110940.L1790@fw.wintelcom.net> <3AE85776.92D6BD90@elischer.org> <20010426120630.A92915@dragon.nuxi.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :Uh people. : :We really, really NEED to agree on the design here. Jason's paper :(http://people.freebsd.org/~jasone/refs/freebsd_kse/freebsd_kse.html) is :explains all this. : :Before any more work is done on KSE's I really feel people should either :agree fully with the paper, or debate its contents first. : :I really doubt a single person will develop KSE, so it is imperative :there is a common sheet of music. : :-- :-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) I've read it. I was under the impression from prior discussions that KSEs belonging to the same process had to be serialized... that you couldn't run them concurrently with each other. I can't imagine how we could possibly run KSEs belonging to the same process concurrently anyway. I think I prefer the original rfork()/KSE model. -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message