Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2005 00:33:45 +0000 From: Robin Becker <robin@reportlab.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ssh protocol in 5.3 Message-ID: <41D5EFE9.4010009@jessikat.fsnet.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20041231224613.16692.qmail@rahul.net> References: <41D724CF.6020404@jessikat.fsnet.co.uk> <20041231224613.16692.qmail@rahul.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Conover wrote: >> From 5.3 do ssh -1 mylog@myhost.com. You can also set a protocol, 1 or > > 2, in the ssh configs, either globally in /etc/ssh ... or > ~/.ssh/config. > > You can also use both, at the same time. ~/.ssh/known_hosts and > ~/.ssh/authorized_keys can have both protocol 1 and 2 records in the > same file; the identity files are different for 1 an 2, but have > different file names in 1 and 2, so can coexist in ~/.ssh. > > John > > Robin Becker writes: > >> I have just upgraded one of my systems from 4.9 to 5.3 and even after restoring my old .ssh folder it seems I cannot get ssh on a 4.9 system to use protocol 1 with the 5.3 system. >> >> Am I being stupid or must I go through the pain of creating a whole new set of keys for protocol 2. >> >> We use protocol 1 for legacy reasons ie we have a very old implementation of ssh on our win32 PCs. >> thanks to all for the helpful replies. As an aside I received this by personal email """Just FYI, 5.3 is not an "upgrade" from 4.9. Its about 25% slower. Do a google groups search with "mailing.freebsd.questions 5.3 performance tests". Robert Watson gives a pretty good explanation about the work that needs to be done to get 5.3 up to production standards.""" I 'upgraded' to 5.3 because I see now that 4.x is regarded as a legacy OS so decided to try it out. Can other more experienced people comment on the above? Should I revert to 4.11 when it appears? -- Robin Becker
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41D5EFE9.4010009>