From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 31 15:11:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0064816A4CE; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 15:11:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from debussy.private.org (25.60.138.210.bn.2iij.net [210.138.60.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C63B43D1D; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 15:11:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chat95@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by debussy.private.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2VNIKuf001286; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 08:18:20 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from chat95@mac.com) Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 08:18:20 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20040401.081820.424244734.chat95@mac.com> To: pmes@bis.midco.net From: Nakata Maho In-Reply-To: <406AFF0F.9060108@bis.midco.net> References: <200403311354.i2VDsxwF081782@repoman.freebsd.org> <406AFF0F.9060108@bis.midco.net> Organization: private X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on XEmacs 21.4.14 (Reasonable Discussion) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: kan@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: outstanding issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 23:11:43 -0000 In Message-ID: <406AFF0F.9060108@bis.midco.net> Peter Schultz wrote: > What can be done to get this to compile with gcc 3.3.3? Are the "right > people" aware of the problem? Alexander Kabaev imported gcc 3.3.3, I'm not sure. > maybe he can help resolve the problem? I'm not sure. exception handler (try/catch) seems to be broken for very complex situation. simple example runs fine with 3.3.3 with FreeBSD 5.2.1. > I'm curious about the dependency on gcp, why is that required? > > I see the port Makefile says --enable-mozilla=no, but the port still > requires mozilla 1.0.2. I'm confused. :-) this is wired but true :) should be a bug. kan-san, would you please upgreade gcc3.3.3 for 5-current? we have serious problem building OOo. but I not sure OOo compiles fine with newer version of it. at least some exception hanlder seems to be broken for some compiex situation. thanks, --nakata maho