Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 16 Oct 1997 09:52:27 -0100 (GMT)
From:      Remy NONNENMACHER <remy@synx.com>
To:        Stephen Comoletti <rugose@www.delanet.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Strange IDE perfs
Message-ID:  <Pine.A32.3.91.971016094058.40734I-100000@rs1>
In-Reply-To: <199710160223.WAA28147@www.delanet.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 15 Oct 1997, Stephen Comoletti wrote:

> Is the quantum drive one of the new fireball Super ATA drives? If so, you
> will not get the performance off a standard eide motherboard interface.
> Those drives are made to work with the Ultra ATA cards, like the Promise
> Ultra33 (see the web page for Promise technology). They still work under
> the older ide interface but suffer a large performance hit. 
>

Can the Intel PIIX4 Ultra-dma capable be qualified as 'standard eide 
motherboard interface' ? What i can't understand is using the SAME disk, 
with the SAME chipset but with the 2.2.2-RELEASE gives me about ten times 
more perfs then with the 3.0SNAP. The 2.2.2-RELEASE doesn't do more then 
identifiying the PIIX as a 'storage device', but the 3.0 comes with a 
bunch of device initialisation concerning pci_ide devices. (and the PIIX is
tested and recognized correctly). The Quantum disk is Udma capable and 
the bios claims it as been initialized as. Do i missed something in the 
config options ?

> Steve
> 
> ----------
> > From: Remy NONNENMACHER <remy@synx.com>
> > To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
> > Subject: Strange IDE perfs
> > Date: Wednesday, October 15, 1997 10:05 PM
> > 
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I installed a 3.0-971012-SNAP release on a machine (AMD K6/200 - Asus
> TX97E)
> > and expected impressive IDE perfs. BUT, surprise !! Comparatively to a 
> > 2.2.2-RELEASE, running on a K6/233, same card (TX97E), I can't get more
> than
> > 1 MByte/s from a Quantum Udma 4.3 Gig. My 2.2.2 gives me about 8MBytes/s
> with
> > the same disk. (Note: i tried flags 0x80FF and 0xA0FF on wdc def and got
> no 
> > diffs).
> > 
> > Any idea ?
> > 
> > TIA for replies.
> > 
> > PS : the ide_pci chipset is a PIIX4 Intel.
> 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.A32.3.91.971016094058.40734I-100000>