From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 1 11:42:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD4316A400 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 11:42:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [209.31.154.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9745C13C44B for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 11:42:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E15A46EC5; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 07:42:44 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 12:42:44 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Michael Reifenberger In-Reply-To: <20070601125901.W92469@fw.reifenberger.com> Message-ID: <20070601124053.H77697@fledge.watson.org> References: <20070601105521.D77697@fledge.watson.org> <20070601125901.W92469@fw.reifenberger.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NET_NEEDS_GIANT removal X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 11:42:44 -0000 On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Michael Reifenberger wrote: > ... >> >> i4b - ISDN implementation > ... > > Before deleting we should replace i4b with the one from hps. > http://www.selasky.org/hans_petter/isdn4bsd/index.html It was said to be > GIANT free last time I asked. As I have neither access to ISDN hardware nor infrastructure, I have no personal interest in the ISDN code. However, as Bjoern has a work-in-progress on i4b, I'll let him respond to any questions about approach. I believe his initial plan is to provide some basic subsystem code based on minimal changes to the current implementation. Per my e-mail, there are no immediate plans to delete the current i4b code from the repository, which should make distributing and testing patches against i4b easier. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge