From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jan 27 11:45:15 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA00508 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 11:45:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from kithrup.com (kithrup.com [205.179.156.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA00437 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 11:44:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sef@kithrup.com) Received: (from sef@localhost) by kithrup.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA15317; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 11:44:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sef) Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 11:44:35 -0800 (PST) From: Sean Eric Fagan Message-Id: <199901271944.LAA15317@kithrup.com> To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "JAIL" code headed for -current. In-Reply-To: <29763.917434096.kithrup.freebsd.current@critter.freebsd.dk> Organization: Kithrup Enterprises, Ltd. Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article <29763.917434096.kithrup.freebsd.current@critter.freebsd.dk> you write: >The biggest impact of this is a new argument to the suser() call >all over the kernel: > > suser(NOJAIL, bla, bla); >or > suser(0, bla, bla); Oh, goody, more gratuitious incomaptibilities with everyone else. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message