From owner-cvs-usrsbin Mon Jul 3 22:54:18 1995 Return-Path: cvs-usrsbin-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id WAA15139 for cvs-usrsbin-outgoing; Mon, 3 Jul 1995 22:54:18 -0700 Received: from specgw.spec.co.jp (specgw.spec.co.jp [202.32.13.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id WAA15133 ; Mon, 3 Jul 1995 22:53:58 -0700 Received: from tama3.spec.co.jp (tama3 [202.32.13.252]) by specgw.spec.co.jp (8.6.5/3.3Wb-SPEC) with SMTP id OAA11802; Tue, 4 Jul 1995 14:48:56 +0900 Message-Id: <9507040559.AA00088@tama3.spec.co.jp.spec.co.jp> Date: Tue, 04 Jul 1995 14:59:08 +0900 From: Atsushi Murai To: gibbs@freefall.cdrom.com Cc: davidg@Root.COM, CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com, cvs-usrsbin@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/ppp ipcp.c In-Reply-To: <199507040445.VAA12010@freefall.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: AL-Mail 0.94Beta Sender: cvs-usrsbin-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk "Justin T. Gibbs" wrote: : :This topic has been rolling around on the mailing lists for some time now. :All comments have been that the mapping is bogus. No RFCs mention the :magic address "192.0.0.1". This combined with all of the other reasons :stated on this list make it fairly obvious that the mapping is wrong. I :think that these are the reasons that David made the change. I don't :think David missed any of the steps you show on your list. As soon as :you find a reason for the code to be reverted, it will be. Do you find a magic address "0.0.0.0" for such use on RFC ? I just think of dial-on-demand mode.... :I don't think of David as a god. I think of him as the system architecht, and :as such, his say goes. Whatever you think of him, such comments don't belong :on our mailing lists. Yes. He is not got and I don't mean it you are getting a such a emotion. Atsushi. -- Atsushi Murai E-Mail: amurai@spec.co.jp SPEC Voice : +81-3-3833-5341 System Planning and Engineering Corp.