From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Sep 18 21:48:44 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA09449
          for questions-outgoing; Thu, 18 Sep 1997 21:48:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pili.adn.edu.ph (pili.adn.edu.ph [165.220.57.4])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA09431
          for <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 18 Sep 1997 21:48:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (art@localhost)
	by pili.adn.edu.ph (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA10754
	for <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 19 Sep 1997 13:00:49 +0800 (PHT)
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 13:00:49 +0800 (PHT)
From: Arthur Alacar <art@pili.adn.edu.ph>
cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: telnet restriction.
In-Reply-To: <33E35D1E.1221@PartsNow.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970919125243.10687A-100000@pili.adn.edu.ph>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


good day!!

in telnet we can specify other port number by specifying it in our command
line after the hostname, and the default port number is 23 (for telnet
service). the question is is it possible for my system to be configured in
such a way that it _restricts_ users from any remote access through a
different port number, thus only 23 service is allowed.

thank you!

|art|