From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 8 21:43:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC1A16A4CE for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 21:43:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from saltmine.radix.net (saltmine.radix.net [207.192.128.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E84543D5C for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 21:43:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dickey@saltmine.radix.net) Received: from saltmine.radix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i58LhGkL017438 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 17:43:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from dickey@localhost) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) id i58LhFJu017432 for freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 17:43:15 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 17:43:15 -0400 From: Thomas Dickey To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <20040608214315.GB17154@saltmine.radix.net> References: <200406081157.i58BvGJd012588@dungeon.home> <20040608122735.GA10813@nagual.pp.ru> <20040608153838.GF23083@green.homeunix.org> <20040608201124.GA18439@nagual.pp.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/NkBOFFp2J2Af1nK" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040608201124.GA18439@nagual.pp.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Subject: Re: sshd should not use TCP_NODELAY X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 21:43:18 -0000 --/NkBOFFp2J2Af1nK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 12:11:24AM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 11:38:38AM -0400, Brian Feldman wrote: > > be set on both ends. I don't think TCP_NODELAY is really the problem, > > but I bet that without it there would be enough delay in-between various > > multi-character control sequences (arrow keys, etc.) that they'd > > become useless. >=20 > No. I use PuTTY client with TCP_NODELAY off and remote FreeBSD ncurses and > termcap-based apps which accepts escape sequences without any single > problem. that's a (by default) 1-second timeout. --=20 Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net --/NkBOFFp2J2Af1nK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (SunOS) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQFAxjLytIqByHxlDocRAlFMAKCRQdYGdadbQyE1VZblg0tPmygdRACeLWt+ 9OIEWdwJ4vFejOeCq/gYdGg= =kUPF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/NkBOFFp2J2Af1nK--