From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Feb 17 8: 5:32 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from stephens.ml.org (cm2081634025.ponderosa.ispchannel.com [208.163.40.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7FD81104B for ; Wed, 17 Feb 1999 08:05:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tas@stephens.ml.org) Received: from stephens.ml.org (localhost.loc [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by stephens.ml.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA24351; Wed, 17 Feb 1999 16:05:24 GMT (envelope-from tas@stephens.ml.org) Message-Id: <199902171605.QAA24351@stephens.ml.org> To: Jim Pirzyk Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, Thomas Stephens From: Thomas Stephens Subject: Re: ksh93? In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 17 Feb 1999 10:08:02 EST." <99021710091400.35933@amigo.faf.fa.disney.com> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 08:05:23 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jim Pirzyk wrote: >On Wed, 17 Feb 1999, Thomas Stephens wrote: >>Jim Pirzyk wrote: >>>I have been using the BSDI version for a long time now (2 - 3 years) >>>and I have not had any problems with it. I would be interested in >>>a native FreeBSD version and how much faster it would run. >>> >>>pirzyk@amigo:~ >>>1>file /bin/ksh >>>/bin/ksh: BSD/OS i386 compact demand paged executable not stripped >> >>Thanks for the info! Is the BSDI ksh part of BSD/OS (i.e. is a BSD/OS >>licence necessary to use it)? One other thing: do you know which >>version it is (93 or 88)? > >No, I downloaded the BSDI ksh from att and it follows their license. > >http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/reuse/packages/ksh93.html > >Yes it is ksh93. Oops, thanks for clearing that up! I didn't realise the BSD/OS port was currently available. Of course, a FreeBSD port would be better still. Thomas Stephens tas@stephens.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message