Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:07:29 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> To: "Randal L. Schwartz" <merlyn@stonehenge.com> Cc: John <john@starfire.mn.org>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Programmer In Training <pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us>, Anton <anton@sng.by> Subject: Re: Thousands of ssh probes Message-ID: <4B912C41.8090505@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <86sk8e4vhj.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> References: <20100305125446.GA14774@elwood.starfire.mn.org> <4B910139.1080908@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100305132604.GC14774@elwood.starfire.mn.org> <1108389354.20100305154152@sng.by> <861vfy6add.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <20100305154654.GB17456@elwood.starfire.mn.org> <86sk8e4vhj.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 05/03/2010 15:51:52, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> The spamtrap is a shiny object for spam, and anything that goes there gets
> blocked for an hour from hitting the low port. I presented this at a
> conference once.
Having an IPv6-only high-mx seems to terminally confuse most spambots...
Cheers,
Matthew
- --
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
Kent, CT11 9PW
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkuRLEAACgkQ8Mjk52CukIw//gCfS3MaEN0c+8gaHqS8RbQq/Nsz
KtEAnRb5oIrwk4DGMR4uzfB+tO5mh/sp
=Duju
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B912C41.8090505>